Volumetric growth rate of incidentally found meningiomas on immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: The expression of PD-L1 in high-grade meningiomas made it a potential target for immunotherapy research in refractory cases. Several prospective studies in this field are still on going. We sought to retrospectively investigate the effects of check-point inhibitors (CI) on meningiomas that had been naïve to either surgical or radiation approaches by following incidental meningiomas found during treatment with CI for various primary metastatic cancers. METHODS: We used the NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center Data Hub to find patients treated by CI for various cancers, who also had serial computerized-tomography (CT) or magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) reports of intracranial meningiomas. Meningioma volumetric measurements were compared between the beginning and end of the CI treatment period. Patients treated with chemotherapy during this period were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included in our study, of which 14 (56%) were on CI for melanoma, 5 (20%) for non-small-cell lung cancer and others. CI therapies included nivolumab (n = 15, 60%), ipilimumab (n = 11, 44%) and pembrolizumab (n = 9, %36), while 9 (36%) were on ipilimumab/nivolumab combination. We did not find any significant difference between tumor volumes before and after treatment with CI (1.31 ± 0.46 vs. 1.34 ± 0.46, p=0.8, respectively). Among patients beyond 1 year of follow-up (n = 13), annual growth was 0.011 ± 0.011 cm3/year. Five patients showed minor volume reduction of 0.12 ± 0.10 cm3 (21 ± 6% from baseline). We did not find significant predictors of tumor volume reduction. CONCLUSION: Check-point inhibitors may impact the natural history of meningiomas. Additional research is needed to define potential clinical indications and treatment goals.

Primary Diffuse Leptomeningeal Melanomatosis in an Indian Child With Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Primary diffuse leptomeningeal melanomatosis (PDLM) is an extremely rare, aggressive malignant neoplasia of the central nervous system. We report the first case of pediatric PDLM from India. METHODS: A review of literature was done to describe the 15 pediatric cases reported so far. RESULTS: A 12-year-old male child presented with fever, vomiting, and headache for 2 months. Cerebrospinal fluid examination was normal. An MRI of the brain revealed hydrocephalus, for which antitubercular therapy was started and external ventricular drainage followed by ventriculoperitoneal shunt was done. Repeat MRI revealed a suprasellar lesion, nodular enhancement of cranial nerves along with dural enhancement of spinal cord with arachnoiditis, and long-segment myelomalacia. Repeat cerebrospinal fluid examination was negative for malignant cells. During biopsy, blackish dura with diffuse blackish deposits in ventricle were noted. Histopathological examination revealed tumor cells with intracytoplasmic coarse brown pigment melanoma, frequent mitotic figures, and immunohistochemistry testing was positive for human melanoma black-45 and MelanA, suggestive of PDLM. He expired 4 months after the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing PDLM can be daunting in light of its slow but malignant progression mimicking TBM leading to improper management. However, the absence of any supportive microbiological evidence and failure to respond to the standard antitubercular therapy with subsequent progression of the symptoms should prompt the need for finding an alternative diagnosis. A targeted molecular diagnosis and precision medicine may provide a favorable outcome in children with PDLM.

Myeloblastic meningeal neoplasm: an unusual natural history.

Myeloid sarcoma is a very rare extramedullary malignant tumour, most often associated with acute myeloid leukaemia. We report the case of a man in his early 20s who presented with chronic headache, raised intracranial pressure and progressive vision loss of 2 years duration with no systemic manifestations. He had a history of myeloid sarcoma of the left thigh 15 years ago, treated with external beam radiotherapy and in complete remission for more than 13 years. However, the progressive blindness remained unexplained for 2 years, and he was eventually diagnosed with isolated meningeal relapse without marrow or systemic involvement. Imaging revealed subarachnoid haemorrhage, diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement and involvement of lower dorsal cord and conus, and cerebrospinal fluid cytology showed myeloid blasts. He was managed with intrathecal chemotherapy and craniospinal irradiation, after which he had mild improvement in vision.

Primary Diffuse Leptomeningeal Melanomatosis in a Child with Extracranial Metastasis: Case Report.

Primary meningeal melanomatosis is an extremely rare tumor with very few documented responses to treatment. A 3-year-old male with a complex past medical history, including prematurity and shunted hydrocephalus, was diagnosed with primary meningeal melanomatosis with peritoneal implants. Molecular testing revealed an NRAS Q61R mutation. The patient received proton craniospinal radiation followed by immunotherapy with nivolumab (1 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) IV every 3 weeks and, upon progression, he was switched to a higher dose of nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) and binimetinib (24 mg/m2/dose, twice a day). The patient had significant improvement of CNS disease with radiation therapy and initial immunotherapy but progression of extracranial metastatic peritoneal and abdominal disease. Radiation was not administered to the whole abdomen. After two cycles of nivolumab and treatment with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib, he had radiographic and clinical improvement in abdominal metastasis and ascitis. He ultimately died from RSV infection, Klebsiella sepsis, and subdural hemorrhage without evidence of tumor progression. This is the first report of a child with primary meningeal melanomatosis with extracranial metastatic disease with response to a combination of radiation, immunotherapy and MEK inhibitor therapy.

The Natural History and Treatment of Meningiomas: An Update.

Meningiomas are the most frequent nonmalignant tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). Despite their benign nature and slow-growing pattern, if not diagnosed early, these tumors may reach relatively large sizes causing significant morbidity and mortality. Some variants are located in hard-to-access locations, compressing critical neurovascular structures, and making the surgical management even more challenging. Although most meningiomas have a good long-term prognosis after treatment, there are still controversies over their management in a subset of cases. While surgery is the first-line treatment, the use of fractionated radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery is indicated for residual or recurrent tumors, small lesions, and tumors in challenging locations. Advances in molecular genetics and ongoing clinical trial results have recently helped both to refine the diagnosis and provide hope for effective biomolecular target-based medications for treatment. This article reviews the natural history and current therapeutic options for CNS meningiomas.

Lifestyle and subsequent meningioma in childhood cancer survivors: A report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle is associated with meningioma risk in the general population. AIMS: We assessed longitudinal associations between lifestyle-associated factors and subsequent meningiomas in childhood cancer survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Childhood cancer survivors age ≥18 years in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study were evaluated for body composition, self-reported physical activity, cardiopulmonary fitness, muscle strength, smoking, and alcohol consumption at baseline. Time to first meningioma analyses were performed, adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis and baseline assessment, treatment decade, and childhood cancer treatment exposures. The study included 4,072 survivors (47% female; [mean (SD)] 9 (6) years at diagnosis; 30 (8.5) years at the start of follow-up, with 7.0 (3.3) years of follow-up). 30% of the participants were survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 29% of the participants had received cranial radiation. During follow-up, 90 participants developed ≥1 meningioma, of whom 73% were survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, with cranial radiation being the strongest risk factor (relative risk [RR] 29.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.6-83.2). Muscle strength assessed by knee extension was associated with a lower risk of developing a meningioma in the adjusted analyses (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.0, p = 0.04 for quartiles 3-4 vs. 1). No other lifestyle-associated variable was associated with subsequent meningioma. CONCLUSION: Independent of cranial radiation, muscle strength was associated with a lower risk of developing a subsequent meningioma in childhood cancer survivors.

Skull Base Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the presenting features, molecular characteristics, diagnosis, and management of selected skull base tumors, including meningiomas, vestibular schwannomas, pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, craniopharyngiomas, chordomas, ecchordosis physaliphora, chondrosarcomas, esthesioneuroblastomas, and paragangliomas. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Skull base tumors pose a management challenge given their complex location and, as a result, the tumors and treatment can result in significant morbidity. In most cases, surgery, radiation therapy, or both yield high rates of disease control, but the use of these therapies may be limited by the surgical accessibility of these tumors and their proximity to critical structures. The World Health Organization classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors was updated in 2022. Scientific advances have led to an enhanced understanding of the genetic drivers of many types of skull base tumors and have revealed several potentially targetable genetic alterations. This information is being leveraged in the design of ongoing clinical trials, with the hope of rendering these challenging tumors treatable through less invasive and morbid measures. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Tumors involving the skull base are heterogeneous and may arise from bony structures, cranial nerves, the meninges, the sinonasal tract, the pituitary gland, or embryonic tissues. Treatment often requires a multidisciplinary approach, with participation from radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, and surgical specialists, including neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, and head and neck surgeons. Treatment has largely centered around surgical resection, when feasible, and the use of first-line or salvage radiation therapy, with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or both considered in selected settings. Our growing understanding of the molecular drivers of these diseases may facilitate future expansion of pharmacologic options to treat skull base tumors.

Pediatric Meningiomas: Current Insights on Pathogenesis and Management.

Meningiomas are rare tumors in children, ranging from 0.4 to 4% of intracranial tumors. Differently from their adult counterpart, pediatric meningiomas (PMs) often show peculiar aspects such as the development of tumoral cysts, the involvement of the intraventricular space, and missing attachment to the dura mater. The most important difference with adults is represented by the high incidence of WHO grade II and III variants, which can account for more than 70% of cases. The prognosis of PMs mainly depends on the initial surgical resection because radiotherapy, which is the main treatment option in the case of tumor recurrence or progression, does not seem to increase the relapse free survival and the overall survival, and chemotherapy still misses specific and effective protocols.On these grounds, the need to better understand these tumors, to favor an appropriate multidisciplinary management, is particularly felt. The present review is focused on the advances on the pathogenesis, the molecular aspects, and the managements of PMs, with the goal to improve the knowledge of these challenging neoplasms.

Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods were retrospectively reviewed in search of patients with presumed incidental meningioma. These patients were further analyzed using medical health records, with the purpose to study clinical handling and outcome during a 3 year follow up. RESULTS: An identical number of unique patients underwent brain imaging during the two time periods (n = 22 259 vs. 22 013). In 2018-2019, 25% more incidental meningiomas were diagnosed compared to 2008-2009 (n = 161 vs. 129, p = 0.052). MRI was used more often in 2018-2019 (26.1 vs. 12.4%, p = 0.004), and the use of contrast enhancement, irrespective of modality, also increased (26.8 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). In the most recent cohort, patients were older (median 79 years vs. 73 years, p = 0.03). Indications showed a significant increase of cancer without known metastases among scanned patients. 29.5 and 35.4% of patients in the cohorts were deceased 3 years after diagnosis for causes unrelated to their meningioma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the same number of unique patients undergoing brain scans in the time periods, there was a trend towards more patients diagnosed with an incidental asymptomatic meningioma in the more recent years. This difference may be attributed to more contrast enhanced scans and more scans among the elderly but needs to be further studied. Patients in the cohort from 2018 to 2019 more often had non-metastatic cancer, with their cause of scan screening for metastases. There was no significant difference in management decision at diagnosis, but within 3 years of follow up significantly more patients in the latter cohort had been re-scanned. Almost a third of all patients were deceased within 3 years after diagnosis, due to causes other than their meningioma.

New strategies for the treatment of breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Leptomeningeal metastasis is a complication of metastatic breast cancer that has a rising incidence likely due to the increased availability of novel systemic therapies, which have improved survival with better extracranial disease control but with limited intracranial efficacy. A poor prognosis of less than 6 months has historically been associated with leptomeningeal metastasis and it is often an exclusion factor for enrollment in clinical trials. There are limited evidence-based data supporting use of therapeutics in leptomeningeal metastasis patients and recommendations are largely derived from retrospective reports and small prospective studies. However, in recent years, there has been a surge in effective modern therapeutics with promising intracranial activity. RECENT FINDINGS: The study aims to review the most recent updates in the management of leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer. We discuss the effectiveness and limitations of intrathecal administration, predictive biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid, proton radiation therapy and promising new systemic therapies such as antibody drug conjugates. SUMMARY: Ongoing development of clinical trials that allow inclusion of leptomeningeal metastasis are essential for establishing efficacy potential and discovering new treatment options in this population of great unmet need.

Pachymeningeal disease: a systematic review and metanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Pachymeningeal disease (PMD) is a newly recognized pattern of brain metastasis (BrM) failure that specifically occurs following surgery with adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and has unique prognostic implications relative to leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Here, we report its prevalence, prognostic implications, and associated risk factors. METHODS: A literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on PUBMED and Cochrane from January 2000 to June 2023. RESULTS: We identified 12 studies that included a total of 3992 BrM patients, 659 (16.5%) of whom developed meningeal disease (MD) following surgery plus adjuvant SRS, including either PMD or LMD. The mean prevalence of MD across studies was 20.9% (7.9-38.0%), with PMD accounting for 54.6% of this prevalence and LMD comprising the remaining 45.4%. Mean of the median overall survivals following diagnosis of PMD and LMD was 10.6 months and 3.7 months p = 0.007, respectively, a significant difference. Only 2 risk factors for PMD were reported in ≥ 2 studies and also identified as statistically significant per our meta-analysis: infratentorial location and controlled systemic disease status. CONCLUSION: While PMD has a superior prognosis to LMD, it is nevertheless a critical oncologic event associated with significant mortality and remains poorly recognized. PMD is predominantly observed in patients with controlled systemic disease status and infratentorial location. Future treatment strategies should focus on reducing surgical seeding and sterilizing surgical cavities.

Disease-Based Prognostication: Neuro-Oncology.

Primary malignant and non-malignant brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors, while relatively rare, are a disproportionate source of morbidity and mortality. Here we provide a brief overview of approaches to modeling important clinical outcomes, such as overall survival, that are critical for clinical care. Because there are a large number of histologically distinct types of primary malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors, this chapter will provide an overview of prognostication considerations on the most common primary non-malignant brain tumor, meningioma, and the most common primary malignant brain tumor, glioblastoma. In addition, information on nomograms and how they can be used as individualized prognostication tools by clinicians to counsel patients and their families regarding treatment, follow-up, and prognosis is described. The current state of nomograms for meningiomas and glioblastomas are also provided.

Advances in the systemic therapy for recurrent meningiomas and the challenges ahead.

INTRODUCTION: Meningiomas represent the most common primary neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS). 20% present with atypical (WHO grade II) or malignant (grade III) meningiomas, which show aggressive biologic behavior and high recurrence. Although surgical resection and radiation therapy are the primary treatment options for these tumors, there is a subgroup of patients who do not respond well to or are poor candidates for these approaches, leading to the exploration of systemic therapies as an alternative. AREAS COVERED: The literature on different therapeutic groups of systemic drugs for recurrent meningiomas is reviewed, with a focus on the different molecular targets. Past and current ongoing clinical trials are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: To date, there is no recognized treatment that has demonstrated a substantial increase in progression-free or overall survival rates. Nonetheless, therapies targeting anti-VEGF have exhibited more encouraging results in general. The examination of genomic and epigenomic traits of meningiomas, along with the integration of molecular markers into the latest WHO tumor grading system, has provided valuable insights. This has opened avenues for exploring numerous intracellular and extracellular pathways, as well as mutations, that have been targeted in ongoing clinical trials.

[Molecular genetic features of meningiomas]. / Molekulyarno-geneticheskie osobennosti meningiom.

Meningioma is the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system. Traditional classification is based on histological properties of tumors and distinguishes different grades of meningioma malignancy. However, knowledge about different molecular mechanisms of tumor provided new data on genetic features of meningiomas. The authors analyze current available data on the main driver mutations, new classifications based on molecular genetic characteristics and potential targets for therapy.

Sporadic and neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningioma in children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: Pediatric meningioma differs not only in its rare incidence from the adult meningioma, but also in its clinical characteristics. Many treatment approaches of pediatric meningioma are based on the study results of adult meningioma studies. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of pediatric meningioma. METHODS: Data on pediatric patients diagnosed between 1982 and 2021 with NF2-associated or sporadic meningioma and recruited in the trials/registries HIT-ENDO, KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2000/2007 and KRANIOPHARYNGEOM Registry 2019 were retrospectively analyzed for clinical characteristics, etiology, histology, therapy, and outcome. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen study participants were diagnosed with sporadic or NF2-associated meningioma at a median age of 10.6 years. There was a 1:1 sex ratio, with 14% of study participants suffering from NF2. 46% of the meningiomas were located hemispherically, 17% at the optic nerve/ intraorbital and 10% ventricularly. Multiple meningiomas were detected in 69% of NF2 patients and in 9% of sporadic meningiomas. 50% of the meningiomas were WHO grade I, 37% WHO grade II and 6% WHO grade III. Progressions or recurrences occurred after a median interval of 1.9 years. Eight patients (7%) died, 3 of them due to disease. The event-free survival was higher for WHO grade I than for WHO grade II meningioma patients (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The major difference to the preceding literature could be found in the distribution of different WHO grades and their influence on event-free survival. Prospective studies are warranted to assess the impact of different therapeutic regimens. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00258453; NCT01272622; NCT04158284.

Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Meningiomas.

Meningiomas are the most common brain tumor in adults with rising incidence rates due to an aging population globally, increased availability of neuroimaging, and increased awareness of this condition by treating clinicians and primary care physicians. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment, with adjuvant radiotherapy reserved for higher grade meningiomas or tumors that undergo incomplete resections. Whereas these tumors were classically defined by their histopathological features and subtypes, recent work has uncovered the molecular alterations that may lead to tumor development and have important prognostic implications. However, there remain important clinical questions regarding the management of meningiomas and current clinical guidelines continue to evolve as additional studies add onto the growing body of work that enables us to better understand these tumors.

Immune Profiling of Meningiomas.

Though meningiomas are generally regarded as benign tumors, there is increasing awareness of a large group of meningiomas that are biologically aggressive and refractory to the current standards of care treatment modalities. Coinciding with this has been increasing recognition of the important that the immune system plays in mediating tumor growth and response to therapy. To address this point, immunotherapy has been leveraged for several other cancers such as lung, melanoma, and recently glioblastoma in the context of clinical trials. However, first deciphering the immune composition of meningiomas is essential in order to determine the feasibility of similar therapies for these tumors. Here in this chapter, we review recent updates on characterizing the immune microenvironment of meningiomas and identify potential immunological targets that hold promise for future immunotherapy trials.

Preclinical Models of Meningioma.

The management of clinically aggressive meningiomas remains challenging due to limited treatment options aside from surgical removal and radiotherapy. High recurrence rates and lack of effective systemic therapies contribute to the unfavorable prognosis of these patients. Accurate in vitro and in vivo models are critical for understanding meningioma pathogenesis and to identify and test novel therapeutics. In this chapter, we review cell models, genetically engineered mouse models, and xenograft mouse models, with special emphasis on the field of application. Finally, promising preclinical 3D models such as organotypic tumor slices and patient-derived tumor organoids are discussed.

Immunotherapy for Meningiomas.

Systemic treatment approaches are urgently needed for a subset of meningioma patients who do not achieve local tumor control with surgery and radiotherapy. Classical chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic agents exert only very limited activity in these tumors. Long-term survival of patients with advanced metastatic cancer following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, i.e., monoclonal antibodies designed to unleash suppressed anticancer immune responses, has fostered hopes for benefit from similar approaches in patients with meningiomas that recur after standard local therapy. Moreover, a plethora of immunotherapy approaches beyond these drugs have entered clinical development or clinical practice for other cancer entities, including (i) novel immune checkpoint inhibitors that may act independently of T cell activity, (ii) cancer peptide or dendritic cell vaccines to induce anticancer immunity utilizing cancer-associated antigens, (iii) cellular therapies utilizing genetically modified peripheral blood cells to directly target cancer cells, (iv) T cell engaging recombinant proteins that link tumor antigen-binding sites to effector cell activating or recognition domains, or to immunogenic cytokines, and (v) oncolytic virotherapy utilizing attenuated viral vectors designed to specifically infect cancer cells, seeking to elicit systemic anticancer immunity. This chapter provides an overview of the principles of immunotherapy, summarizes ongoing immunotherapy clinical trials in meningioma patients, and discusses the applicability of established and emerging immunotherapy concepts to meningioma patients.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Intracranial Meningioma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Historically, largely due to the good prognosis for survival, there has been little attention paid to the possible impact of meningiomas and their treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, in the last decade there has been increasing evidence that patients with intracranial meningiomas suffer from long-term decreases in their HRQoL. Compared with controls and normative data, meningioma patients have worse HRQoL scores both before and after intervention and continuing long term (even after >4 years of follow-up). Overall, surgery results in improvements in many aspects of HRQoL. The limited available studies investigating the impact of radiotherapy suggest that this type of treatment decreases HRQoL scores, especially in the long term. There is however only limited evidence on additional determinants of HRQoL. Patients with anatomically complex skull base meningiomas and severe comorbidities, including epilepsy, report the lowest HRQoL scores. Other tumor and sociodemographic characteristics have shown weak associations with HRQoL. Furthermore, about one-third of caregivers of meningioma patients report caregiver burden, warranting interventions to improve caregiver HRQoL. As antitumor interventions may not improve HRQoL scores to be comparable to those of the general population, more attention should be paid to the development of integrative rehabilitation and supportive care programs for meningioma patients.